I am no
fan of Hastert, but he just got prosecuted for being a victim of extortion.
I
appreciate when hypocrisy is exposed. Hastert's public stances on
morality are apparently in direct conflict with his behavior. I believe
in the Frank Rule of outing closeted politicians who use their power to hurt
members of the LGBT community (and understand it’s dangerous to conflate
Hastert's sexual orientation with the alleged crime of child
molestation). At first, I was quite pleased that a politician who had loudly
condemned Clinton's misconduct was being outed for much worse misconduct.
But Hastert
was the victim of extortion. He withdrew his own money to pay those
extorting him. He did so in small
amounts so no one would know. When asked
why by FBI agents, he apparently didn’t reveal that he was being extorted
(which is understandable). So he gets
charged for not being truthful to the FBI agents. And for how he withdrew his own money -- under
a statute enacted to stop drug dealers and money launderers, that was never
intended to criminalize victims of extortion.
I can’t
see the DOJ prosecuting anyone else for this.
If it went to trial, he could have won, but the reason he was being
extorted -- alleged acts of child molestation -- would have dominated the
public discourse, even though they aren’t relevant to the charged offense. To avoid that public dialogue, over irrelevant
facts, he had to plea. That’s not
justice. That’s blackmail.
I am no
fan of Hastert. But I am no fan of this
injustice either.
No comments:
Post a Comment