Compassion apparently has no place in politics.
Journalist Philip Bump, of The Washington Post, authored an
article titled “Why being a public defender is increasingly bad for your
political future” (link here: http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/17/why-being-a-public-defender-is-increasingly-bad-for-your-political-future/)
discusses attacks on political candidates who, at one time, represented
indigent clients on court-appointed cases.
These lawyers include Hillary Clinton.
Typically, these lawyers make between 10% - 20% of what their work would
be valued in the private sector, and take this work out of a belief that an
imbalanced legal system is a failed one.
The author writes:
Congressional
Research Service compiled data on the composition of the 113th Congress earlier
this year. Congress includes more than
200 members that have a background in practicing law, including "7
former judges (all in the House), and 32 prosecutors ... who have served in
city, county, state, federal, or military capacities." Prosecutors get to
run on their record of putting criminals away. Defenders don't. A search of the
House's historic database of information on members turns up five members of
the House since 2000 who list work as public defenders in their biographies.
One is no longer in Congress. Another later worked as a prosecutor.
Steve Benjamin, former president of the National Association
for Criminal Defense Lawyers, stated that “It should never be that an attorney
who fulfills his constitutional and ethical obligation to represent a person
who is criminally accused faces a question about that attorney's character or
qualifications for any office.” And
Republican Charlie Condon, the former attorney general of South Carolina,
called such attacks on candidates "fundamentally wrong", stating “The
basis of our whole constitutional system is that it's a noble calling, it's a
really positive profession, positive calling, to be a lawyer and particularly a
criminal defense lawyer."
I am a former Deputy Public Defender for the County of Los
Angeles. It is a badge I wear with
honor. Allowing our society, as a whole,
to let someone be subjected to the criminal justice process -- without the aid
of a competent advocate -- would be, collectively, more horrible than what any individual can do. Innocent people would
be convicted. Some executed. Sentences would be unfairly doled out. And the poor of our country would be treated
completely differently than the rich, to a much greater extent than is already
the case.
There are lawyers who are
willing to forego personal gain, and try to make sure that justice is
administrated properly to everyone. They
protect us all from acting like savages.
They should be applauded for their work – certainly more than those who
chose to make much more money discussing money, like corporate attorneys, or putting people away without
ever talking to them, like prosecutors and judges.
I hope the day
comes when a prosecutor is running for office, and someone plays a ridiculous closing argument they made, filled with inflammatory language that bears nothing to the facs, or shows a cruel streak of sentencing offers, and
the public says “no way can he be in charge – he is an animal.”
No comments:
Post a Comment